Elenco delle pubblicazioni del Think Tank del PE
←
→
Trascrizione del contenuto della pagina
Se il tuo browser non visualizza correttamente la pagina, ti preghiamo di leggere il contenuto della pagina quaggiù
Elenco delle pubblicazioni del Think Tank del PE
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank
Criteri di ricerca utilizzati per generare l''elenco :
Ordina Mostra per data
Parole chiave "accordo di Schengen"
71 Risultati(i)
Data di creazione : 12-03-2022Improving the Schengen evaluation and monitoring mechanism
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data04-10-2021
AutoreVIKOLAINEN Vera
Settore di interventoSpazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia | Valutazione d''impatto ex ante
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | asilo politico | controllo dell'UE | metodo di valutazione | programma dell'UE | proposta (UE) |
studio d'impatto
Riassunto The European Commission proposed to improve the Schengen evaluation and monitoring mechanism established by
Regulation (EU) No 1053/2013. The accompanying impact assessment (IA) provides a well defined problem definition,
substantiated with evidence. Furthermore, the stakeholder opinions are reported consistently throughout the IA and are
used as input for the combination of measures under the preferred option. Moreover, the data sources underpinning
the IA are recent, reliable, consistently referenced and publicly available at the time of writing. However, the focus of
the IA analysis is predominantly on the administrative costs and benefits, while the assessment of economic, social
and fundamental rights impacts of the Mechanism’s functioning remains very limited and their quantification was not
possible.
Briefing EN
European territorial cooperation (Interreg) 2021-2027
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data20-09-2021
AutoreVAN LIEROP Christiaan
Settore di interventoSviluppo regionale
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | controllo delle conoscenze | cooperazione europea | cooperazione regionale | cooperazione
territoriale europea | cooperazione transfrontaliera | Fondo europeo di sviluppo regionale | Fondo strutturale | politica
europea di vicinato | proposta (UE) | statistiche dell'UE | sviluppo regionale
Riassunto On 29 May 2018, the European Commission adopted several proposals aimed at defining the EU cohesion policy for
the post-2020 programming period. The package includes a proposal for the new generation of European territorial
cooperation (ETC) programmes, commonly referred to as 'Interreg'. The proposed regulation would bring significant
changes to the architecture of ETC, with the reshaping of the three traditional cooperation strands (i.e. cross-border,
transnational and interregional cooperation) and the creation of two new components, one dedicated to outermost
regions, the other to interregional cooperation on innovation. Another major novelty is the incorporation of cooperation
with countries other than EU Member States. The proposal was examined simultaneously by the Council and the
European Parliament. In Parliament, the Committee on Regional Development (REGI) was responsible for the file.
Parliament adopted its legislative resolution on the proposal at first reading on 26 March 2019, enabling trilogue
negotiations to get under way with the Council. Agreement on the text was reached at the trilogue meeting of 2
December 2020, with Parliament adopting the draft regulation on 23 June 2021. Signed on 24 June 2021, the final act
was published in the EU Official Journal on 30 June 2021.
Briefing EN
Instrument for financial support for border management and visas 2021-2027
Tipo di pubblicazione In sintesi
Data 01-07-2021
Autore ATANASSOV Nikolai
Settore di intervento Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | ammissione di stranieri | fondo (UE) | frontiere esterne dell'UE | politica dell'UE in materia di
visti | politica migratoria dell'UE | proposta (UE) | quadro finanziario pluriennale
Riassunto In the context of the 2021-2027 Multiannual Financial Framework and the need for support to Member States in
managing the EU’s common external borders, the European Commission adopted a proposal to establish an
instrument for financial support for border management and visas under the proposed Integrated Border Management
Fund. The European Parliament is due to vote at second reading during the July plenary session on the agreed text
resulting from interinstitutional negotiations.
In sintesi EN
Schengen Borders Code
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data26-03-2021
AutoreAHAMAD MADATALI HANNAH NAFIZE
Settore di interventoValutazione del diritto e delle politiche nella pratica
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | cittadino dell'UE | cittadino straniero | controllo alla frontiera | cooperazione transfrontaliera |
epidemia | frontiera interna dell'UE | frontiere esterne dell'UE | malattia da coronavirus | regolamento (UE)
Riassunto Presently, the Schengen Area is confronted with a different reality than in 2016, when the European Parliament and
Council approved Regulation (EU) 2016/399 (as codification of Regulation (EC) No 562/2006 and its subsequent
amendments), establishing a Union Code on the rules governing the movement of persons across borders (Schengen
Borders Code). As stated in the Commission Work Programme of 2021, the current health crisis and pandemic, and
recent developments - related to security concerns and the arrival of refugees -, have exposed the EU’s need to
strengthen its crisis preparedness and management of cross-border pressures, as well as keeping the Schengen
legislation updated, making it suitable to endure the test of time.
Briefing EN
12-03-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 1Policy Departments’ Monthly Highlights - December 2020
Tipo di pubblicazione In sintesi
Data 10-12-2020
Settore di intervento Bilanci | Commercio internazionale | Controllo dei bilanci | Coronavirus | Diritto internazionale pubblico | Energia |
Industria | Mercato interno e Unione doganale | Problemi economici e monetari | Sviluppo regionale
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | Agenzia dell’Unione europea per la cooperazione fra i regolatori nazionali dell’energia |
coesione economica e sociale | competenza extraterritoriale | diffusione delle informazioni | diffusione di informazioni
sull'UE | epidemia | malattia da coronavirus | membro della Corte dei conti (UE) | Parlamento europeo | relazione |
ripresa economica
Riassunto The Monthly Highlights publication provides an overview, at a glance, of the on-going work of the policy departments,
including a selection of the latest and forthcoming publications, and a list of future events.
regional development, cohesion policy, COVID19, WTO, budget control, budget, economy, international affairs,
international law, Schengen governance, single market, European court of Auditors, energy.
In sintesi EN
Lo stato di avanzamento della governance Schengen
Tipo di pubblicazione Studio
Data 27-11-2020
Autore esterno Martin WAGNER & Caitlin KATSIAFICAS
Josephine LIEBL
Leila HADJ ABDOU & Lenka DRAŽANOVÁ
Julien JEANDESBOZ
Settore di intervento Diritti dell''uomo | Sicurezza e difesa | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia | Trasporti | Valutazione del diritto e delle
politiche nella pratica
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | commissione PE | controllo alla frontiera | controllo dell'UE | cooperazione transfrontaliera |
frontiera interna dell'UE | metodo di valutazione | programma dell'UE | rapporto di ricerca | relazione d'attività | Stato
membro UE
Riassunto Il presente studio, commissionato dal Dipartimento tematico del Parlamento europeo Diritti dei cittadini e affari
costituzionali, su richiesta della commissione LIBE, valuta il funzionamento e l'impatto del meccanismo di valutazione e
monitoraggio Schengen nell'ambito del suo primo programma pluriennale (2014-2019), allo scopo di individuarne gli
aspetti positivi e formulare raccomandazioni per rafforzarli. L'ultimo decennio è stato caratterizzato da molte
controversie che hanno coinvolto i governi degli Stati Schengen e le istituzioni dell'Unione e che hanno condotto a un
costante stato di crisi apparente. L'attuale "crisi di Schengen" affonda le sue radici nei mutamenti politici e nelle
carenze strutturali del regime di Schengen. Nonostante tali ostacoli, è opportuno non sottovalutare la resilienza del
sistema Schengen.
Studio EN
Sintesi ES, DE, EN, IT, PL
Towards a common EU approach to lifting coronavirus-related restrictions on freedom of movement
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data26-11-2020
AutoreDUMBRAVA Costica
Settore di interventoCoronavirus | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | controllo alla frontiera | epidemia | frontiera interna dell'UE | libertà di circolazione | malattia da
coronavirus | prevenzione delle malattie | sanità pubblica | software | sorveglianza epidemiologica | telerilevamento
Riassunto In an effort to tackle the second wave of the coronavirus outbreak, EU Member States started reinstating restrictions
on the freedom of movement in October 2020. To prevent a new series of severe and uncoordinated restrictions at
countries' internal borders similar to those of March this year, there have been renewed efforts at the EU level to
establish a coordinated approach towards coronavirus-related restrictions on movement. While the focus is now on the
ongoing health crisis, concerns about the functioning of the Schengen area of free movement predate the pandemic.
As recent terrorist attacks in Europe remind us, scant progress and unfinished reforms in the area of migration,
external borders and security both weaken and threaten to undo the important achievements of Schengen cooperation.
This briefing discusses the key steps taken by the EU to develop a common response to the above challenges and
thus to safeguard the Schengen area. It provides an overview of the main restrictions on movement imposed by EU
and Schengen countries as of 25 November 2020. Since contact-tracing apps have been promoted as a key tool in
combating the pandemic and restoring freedom of movement, this briefing also provides an overview of the existing
coronavirus applications in the EU Member States and their interoperability across borders.
Briefing EN
12-03-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 2In the name of COVID: An Assessment of the Schengen Internal Border Controls and Travel Restrictions
in the EU
Tipo di pubblicazione Studio
Data 30-09-2020
Autore esterno Sergio Carrera, Ngo Chun Luk
Settore di intervento Adozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Coronavirus | Diritti dell''uomo | Mercato interno e Unione
doganale | Sanità pubblica | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | controllo alla frontiera | epidemia | frontiera interna dell'UE | malattia da coronavirus
Riassunto This study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional
Affairs at the request of the LIBE Committee, assesses the mobility restrictive measures adopted by the EU and its
Member States in the fight against COVID-19. It examines the reintroduction of Schengen internal border controls and
intra- and extra-EU travel restrictions. It assesses their compatibility with the Schengen Borders Code, including
proportionality, non-discrimination, privacy and free movement. The research demonstrates that policy priorities have
moved from a logic of containment to one characterized by a policing approach on intra-EU mobility giving priority to
the use of police identity/health checks, interoperable databases and the electronic surveillance of every traveller. It
concludes that Schengen is not in 'crisis'. Instead there has been an ‘EU enforcement and evaluation gap’ of Member
States compliance with EU rules in areas falling under EU competence.
Studio EN
Sintesi ES, DE, FR, PL
The impact of coronavirus on Schengen borders
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 27-04-2020
Autore DUMBRAVA Costica | SABBATI Giulio
Settore di intervento Coronavirus | Sanità pubblica | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | controllo alla frontiera | epidemia | frontiera interna dell'UE | malattia da coronavirus
Riassunto The 26 countries of the Schengen Area are only meant to reintroduce border controls between themselves in specific
circumstances, and for strictly limited periods of time. In recent weeks, many of the Schengen states have reintroduced
border controls, notifying them to the European Commission on the grounds of an immediate threat to public policy as
a result of the spread of coronavirus. This infographic shows the latest situation in respect of border controls put in
place at internal borders within the Schengen Area. This is an update of a briefing published in March 2020.
Briefing EN
Temporary border controls in the Schengen area
Tipo di pubblicazione In sintesi
Data 16-03-2020
Autore DUMBRAVA Costica
Settore di intervento Coronavirus | Diritto UE: sistema e atti giuridici | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | controllo alla frontiera | epidemia | frontiera interna dell'UE | malattia da coronavirus
Riassunto Free movement across internal borders is one of the EU's most important achievements, with important benefits for EU
citizens. The Schengen Borders Code (or Schengen Code) specifies the conditions under which Member States can
introduce temporary checks at their internal borders in cases of serious threats to public policy or internal security. The
Code was revised in 2017 in order to strengthen the EU's external borders and to help cope with unprecedented
migratory pressure and cross-border security threats. A Commission legislative proposal to further update the
Schengen Code in order to tighten up the rules on temporary border controls is currently with the co-legislators. The
recent coronavirus outbreak has pushed several Member States to reintroduce border controls at some of the EU's
internal borders in an attempt to contain the spread of the virus.
In sintesi EN
12-03-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 3EU policies – Delivering for citizens: Protection of EU external borders
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data28-06-2019
AutoreRADJENOVIC Anja
Settore di interventoSpazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | Africa | assistenza preadesione | controllo alla frontiera | dimensione transfrontaliera |
documento d'identità | fondo (UE) | Frontex | frontiera interna dell'UE | frontiere esterne dell'UE | lotta contro la
criminalità | organismo dell'UE | politica migratoria dell'UE | sicurezza europea | terrorismo
Riassunto The unprecedented arrival of refugees and irregular migrants in the EU, which peaked in 2015, exposed a series of
deficiencies and gaps in EU policies on external borders. It affected the functioning of the Schengen rules, leading to
the re-introduction of border checks by several Member States. In response to these challenges, as well as the surge
in terrorist and serious cross-border crime activities, the EU has embarked on a broader process of reform aimed at
strengthening its external borders by reinforcing the links between border controls and security. On the one hand,
measures for protecting the EU's external borders have focused on reinforcing EU border management rules, such as
the Schengen Borders Code, and strengthening and upgrading the mandates of relevant EU agencies, such as
Frontex, eu-LISA, Europol and EASO. On the other hand, in connection with a number of key shortcomings in the EU's
information systems, efforts were made to improve use of the opportunities offered by information systems and
technologies for security, criminal records, and border and migration management. This included strengthening
existing IT systems (SIS II, VIS, Eurodac, ECRIS-TCN), establishing new ones (ETIAS, Entry/Exit System) and
improving their interoperability. The broader mandate and the increase of activities in the area of EU border
management is also reflected in the growing amounts, flexibility, and diversity of EU funds, inside and outside the
current and future EU budget. This is an update of an earlier briefing issued in advance of the 2019 European
elections.
Briefing DE, EN, FR
Multimedia EU policies – Delivering for citizens: Protection of EU external borders
Interoperability between EU border and security information systems
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data14-06-2019
AutoreLUYTEN KATRIEN | VORONOVA Sofija
Settore di interventoAdozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | ammissione di stranieri | biometria | controllo alla frontiera | dati personali | elaborazione del
diritto dell'UE | frontiere esterne dell'UE | politica dell'UE in materia di visti | politica migratoria dell'UE | protezione dei
dati | scambio d'informazioni | sistema di informazione | spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Riassunto To enhance EU external border management and internal security, the European Commission has made several
proposals to upgrade and expand European border and security information systems. As part of a broader process to
maximise their use, the Commission presented legislative proposals for two regulations in December 2017 (amended
in June 2018), establishing an interoperability framework between EU information systems on borders and visas, and
on police and judicial cooperation, asylum and migration. After completion of the legislative procedure at first reading in
the Parliament and in the Council, the final acts were signed by the co-legislators on 20 May 2019 and published in the
Official Journal two days later. Both acts came into force on 11 June 2019. The new rules aim to improve checks at the
EU’s external borders, allow for better detection of security threats and identity fraud, and help in preventing and
combating irregular migration. Third edition. The 'EU Legislation in Progress' briefings are updated at key stages
throughout the legislative procedure.
Briefing EN
Area of freedom, security and justice: Cost of Non-Europe
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data08-05-2019
AutoreVAN BALLEGOOIJ Wouter
Settore di interventoSpazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia | Valore aggiunto europeo
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | analisi dei costi | corruzione | diritto d'asilo | diritto dell'individuo | frontiere esterne dell'UE | lotta
contro la criminalità | politica migratoria dell'UE | protezione dei dati | spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia | Stato di
diritto | terrorismo
Riassunto Substantial progress has been made since creating an area of freedom, security and justice became a major political
objective for the EU 20 years ago. Still, there is a lack of consistent monitoring and enforcement of EU values and
norms as well as outstanding gaps in the EU’s framework in certain areas. These deficiencies have a significant impact
at individual level, notably in terms of preventing the effective exercise of fundamental rights by EU citizens and third
country nationals alike. They also have a negative effect on budgetary spending, growth and tax revenue, which is
estimated at at least €180 billion annually, with the lack of enforcement of EU values still to be assessed in more detail.
Further EU action in four main areas: 1. monitoring and enforcement; 2. the creation of safe legal pathways for
migrants and asylum seekers to enter the EU; 3. ingraining a European law enforcement culture; and 4. completing the
Union’s fundamental rights framework, would have significant benefits. In particular, it could allow individuals to fully
enjoy their fundamental rights and make EU society more secure, open, fair and prosperous. This would also foster
trust in the EU on the basis of its ability to deliver on its aims
Briefing EN
12-03-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 4Revision of the Community Code on Visas
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 12-04-2019
Autore ATANASSOV Nikolai
Settore di intervento Adozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Recepimento e attuazione del diritto | Spazio di libertà,
sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | cittadino straniero | frontiere esterne dell'UE | paesi terzi | parlamento nazionale | politica
dell'UE in materia di visti | politica migratoria dell'UE | proposta (UE)
Riassunto The European Union Code on Visas is one of the core elements of the EU's visa policy. It lays down the procedures
and conditions for issuing short-stay visas for third-country nationals. On 14 March 2018, the Commission adopted a
proposal to revise the Community Code on Visas (the visa code). The main objective of the proposal is to strengthen
the common visa policy while addressing migration and security concerns. This will involve increasing the role of visa
policy in the EU's cooperation with third-countries, also taking economic considerations into account by facilitating the
processing of visas for legitimate travellers who contribute to the EU's economy and its cultural and social
development. After Parliament voted its position on the proposal in December 2018, trilogue negotiations brought an
agreement on a compromise text in February. The plenary is due to vote on confirming this text during the April II
plenary session. Second edition of a briefing originally drafted by Maria Margarita Mentzelopoulou and Costica
Dumbrava. The 'EU Legislation in Progress' briefings are updated at key stages throughout the legislative procedure.
Briefing EN
Protection of EU external borders. Achievements during the legislative term 2014-2019: the role of the
European Parliament
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 12-04-2019
Autore BUX Udo
Settore di intervento Diritto UE: sistema e atti giuridici | Recepimento e attuazione del diritto | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | controllo alla frontiera | Frontex | frontiere esterne dell'UE | politica migratoria dell'UE
Riassunto Gradually since 1995, checks at the internal borders were abolished and a single external border was created. Ever
since, the EU had tried to advance with a common policy on external borders and its various aspects, such as border
controls, visas, asylum, regular migration and return. There has also been a considerable impact on internal border
controls (Schengen area). Considerable progress was made regarding safeguarding the EU’s external borders during
the legislative term 2014-2019, although the migratory crisis of 2015 made deficiencies of the European common
policy evident.
Briefing EN
Safeguarding the Schengen Acquis. Achievements during the legislative term 2014-2019: the role of the
European Parliament
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 11-04-2019
Autore BUX Udo
Settore di intervento Diritto UE: sistema e atti giuridici | Recepimento e attuazione del diritto | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | controllo alla frontiera | frontiere esterne dell'UE
Riassunto The Schengen Area, one of the most valued achievements of the EU, this single area without internal border checks
has come under pressure because of recent migration flows: In order to preserve Schengen in the next years, a
common policy on the EUs external borders is also needed.
Briefing EN
Revision of the Visa Code
Tipo di pubblicazione In sintesi
Data 10-04-2019
Autore RADJENOVIC Anja
Settore di intervento Adozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | cooperazione amministrativa | formalità amministrativa | migrazione illegale | politica dell'UE in
materia di visti | regolamento CE
Riassunto In March 2018, the European Commission submitted a proposal to revise the Community Code on Visas (the Visa
Code). The proposal's main objective is to strengthen the common visa policy while taking into account migration and
security concerns, through increasing the role of visa policy in the EU's cooperation with third countries. Economic
considerations will also come into play, with the facilitation of visa processing for legitimate travellers who contribute to
the EU's economy and its cultural and social development. The agreement on the proposal, reached after trilogue
negotiations, now needs to be confirmed by Parliament, with a vote expected during the April II plenary session.
In sintesi EN
12-03-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 5Reception of asylum-seekers - recast Directive
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 29-03-2019
Autore RADJENOVIC Anja
Settore di intervento Adozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Diritti dell''uomo | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | aiuto ai rifugiati | apolide | asilo politico | cittadino straniero | competenza degli Stati membri |
controllo alla frontiera | diritto d'asilo | frontiere esterne dell'UE | migrante | paesi terzi | politica migratoria dell'UE |
procedura legislativa ordinaria | profugo | proposta (UE)
Riassunto States must treat asylum-seekers and refugees according to the appropriate standards laid down in human rights and
refugee law. The current migration crisis revealed wide divergences in the level of reception conditions provided by
Member States. While some are facing problems in ensuring adequate and dignified treatment of applicants, in others
the standards of reception provided are more generous. This has led to secondary movements of asylum-seekers and
refugees, and has put pressure on certain Member States. The aim of the proposed recast directive, which would
replace the current Reception Conditions Directive, is to ensure greater harmonisation of reception standards and
more equal treatment of asylum-seekers across all Member States, as well as to avoid ‘asylum shopping’ whereby
asylum-seekers choose the Member State with the highest protection standards for their application. Although the co-
legislators reached provisional agreement on the proposal in trilogue, Coreper was not able to confirm the Council’s
support for that text and trilogue negotiations have yet to restart. Fourth edition. The ‘EU Legislation in Progress’
briefings are updated at key stages throughout the legislative procedure.
Briefing EN
Migration [What Think Tanks are thinking]
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 14-12-2018
Autore CESLUK-GRAJEWSKI Marcin
Settore di intervento Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | aiuti umanitari | frontiere esterne dell'UE | gruppo di riflessione | migrazione | paesi terzi |
profugo | relazioni internazionali
Riassunto On 10 December 2018, at a conference in the Moroccan city of Marrakech, more than 160 United Nations members
adopted the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration. This is the first multilateral framework providing
a global response to migration, and comes at a time of mounting public concern about the issue, in particular in the EU
and US. Even though the agreement is non-binding and serves more as a set of best practices for the international
community to improve global cooperation on migration, nearly 30 countries, including the US and a number of EU
Member States, have decided to oppose it. This note offers links to commentaries and studies on migration by major
international think tanks. Earlier papers on the same topic can be found in a previous edition of 'What Think Tanks are
Thinking', published in October 2018.
Briefing EN
European Council conclusions - A rolling check-list of commitments to date
Tipo di pubblicazione Studio
Data 12-12-2018
Autore ANGHEL Suzana Elena | BACIAN Izabela Cristina | DRACHENBERG Ralf
Settore di intervento Adozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Affari esteri | Ambiente | Commercio internazionale | Diritti
dell''uomo | Diritto UE: sistema e atti giuridici | Energia | Mercato interno e Unione doganale | Occupazione | Problemi
economici e monetari | Questioni finanziarie e bancarie | Sicurezza e difesa | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia |
Sviluppo e aiuti umanitari
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | commercio internazionale | competitività | Consiglio europeo | incontro al vertice | mercato unico
| mercato unico digitale | politica dell'occupazione dell'UE | politica di sviluppo | politica economica | politica energetica
dell'UE | politica estera e di sicurezza comune | politica in materia di cambiamenti climatici | politica migratoria dell'UE |
spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Riassunto The role of the European Council – to 'provide the Union with the necessary impetus for its development' and to define
its 'general political directions and priorities' – has evolved rapidly over the last decade. Since June 2014, the
European Council Oversight Unit within the European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS), the European
Parliament's in-house research service and think-tank, has been monitoring and analysing the European Council's
delivery on commitments made in the conclusions of its meetings. This overview of European Council conclusions is a
new, updated and more comprehensive edition of the Rolling Check-List which has been published regularly by the
European Council Oversight Unit since 2014. It is designed to review the degree of progress in achieving the goals that
the European Council has set itself and to assist the Parliament in exercising its important oversight role in this field.
Studio EN
12-03-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 6The migration, borders and security cluster of the 2021-2027 MFF
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data07-12-2018
AutoreDALLI HUBERT
Settore di interventoBilanci | Mercato interno e Unione doganale | Sicurezza e difesa | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | controllo delle migrazioni | controllo doganale | diritto d'asilo | fondo (UE) | frontiere esterne
dell'UE | politica dell'UE in materia di visti | politica migratoria dell'UE | proposta (UE) | sicurezza pubblica | spazio di
libertà, sicurezza e giustizia | studio d'impatto
Riassunto Within the context of the multiannual financial framework the Commission is proposing a cluster of four instruments
under three funds to deal with migration borders and security. This initial appraisal of the Commission’s impact
assessment on the proposals acknowledges the necessity for impact assessments in relation to financial framework
programmes to have a simplified format and scope differing from standard impact assessments and that the document
in question sets out the rationale for the new instruments and explains the choices made in their design. It finds
however that the level of analysis conducted and the measure of the departure from the standard methodology and
format of impact assessments weaken its potential to inform decision-making.
Briefing EN
European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS)
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data18-10-2018
AutoreRADJENOVIC Anja
Settore di interventoAdozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Sicurezza e difesa | Trasporti | Turismo
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | cittadino straniero | controllo alla frontiera | dati personali | Europol | frontiere esterne dell'UE |
politica dell'UE in materia di visti | proposta (UE) | protezione dei dati | raccolta dei dati | sistema di informazione |
terrorismo | turismo | viaggio
Riassunto Strengthening the EU’s external borders is key to ensuring internal security and to preserving freedom of movement in
the Schengen area. While the existing border management information systems do address some of the information
gaps concerning non-EU citizens coming into the EU, there is a lack of information related to visa-exempt third-country
nationals arriving at the Schengen external borders. The European Commission is therefore proposing to set up an
automated system that would gather information on visa-exempt travellers prior to their arrival, in order to determine
any irregular migration, security or public-health risks associated with them. The proposal follows similar models
already existing in the USA, Canada and Australia, among others. ETIAS formally entered into force in October 2018,
but will not become operational before 2021. Fourth edition. The ‘EU Legislation in Progress’ briefings are updated at
key stages throughout the legislative procedure. Please note this document has been designed for on-line viewing.
Briefing EN
Multimedia European Travel Information and Authorisation System (ETIAS) [Policy Podcast]
The role of the European Council in internal security policy
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data11-10-2018
AutoreDRACHENBERG Ralf
Settore di interventoSpazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | calamità naturale | Consiglio europeo | cooperazione di polizia (UE) | criminalità informatica |
disastro causato dall'uomo | frontiere esterne dell'UE | lotta contro la criminalità | scambio d'informazioni | sicurezza
europea | statistiche dell'UE | terrorismo | trasmissione dei dati | trattato sul funzionamento dell'UE | trattato sull'Unione
europea
Riassunto Due to the various terrorist attacks across the EU in recent years, internal security and the fight against terrorism have
become major concerns for EU citizens as well as for the EU Heads of State or Government. The European Council
has a significant Treaty-based role to play in the area of justice and home affairs, including on policy issues such as
the fight against terrorism and organised crime, police cooperation and cybersecurity, often subsumed under the
concept ‘internal security’. In recent years it has carried out this strategic role on various occasions but sometimes in a
more reactive way often in the aftermath of major terrorist attacks. The paper also shows that while the policy fields of
internal security and migration were usually clearly separated in European Council discussions, the two areas are now
increasingly linked, in particular by the subject of external EU border protection. The Salzburg summit of 20 September
2018 is an example for this and also illustrates a recent trend of EU Presidencies to bring together EU Heads of State
or Government in their country to discuss policy topics at the top of their own agendas.
Briefing EN
12-03-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 7EU asylum, borders and external cooperation on migration: Recent developments
Tipo di pubblicazione Analisi approfondita
Data21-09-2018
AutoreATANASSOV Nikolai | RADJENOVIC Anja
Settore di interventoSpazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | aiuto ai rifugiati | apolide | cittadino straniero | controllo alla frontiera | diritto d'asilo | Frontex |
migrazione di ritorno | organismo dell'UE | paesi terzi | politica migratoria dell'UE | profugo | Stato membro UE |
trasferimento di popolazione
Riassunto This publication takes stock of recent EU developments in the area of asylum, borders and external cooperation on
migration. It discusses key initiatives put forward by the EU in order to respond to migratory challenges, focusing on
three major aspects: reforming the common European asylum system, strengthening the EU's external borders and
reinforcing the EU's external cooperation on migration.
Analisi approfondita DE, EN, FR
Acquisition and loss of citizenship in EU Member States: Key trends and issues
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data09-07-2018
AutoreDUMBRAVA Costica | MENTZELOPOULOU Maria-Margarita
Settore di interventoSpazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | apolide | cittadinanza europea | cittadino straniero | competenza degli Stati membri | diritti del
bambino | diritto di soggiorno | giurisprudenza (UE) | integrazione dei migranti | libertà di circolazione | naturalizzazione
| politica dell'UE in materia di visti | profugo | Stato membro UE | terrorismo
Riassunto Access to citizenship status is an important prerequisite for enjoying rights and privileges, such as migration and
political rights, as well as for developing a sense of identity and belonging. Since the establishment of Union
citizenship, all persons who are nationals or citizens of an EU Member State enjoy the status of EU citizenship, which
confers on them a number of additional rights and privileges. However, Member States retain full control over who can
be recognised as a citizen. Although the legal rules on the acquisition and loss of citizenship in the EU Member States
remain fairly divergent, one can identify a number of key trends and issues. The need to integrate long-term
immigrants has pushed EU countries to amend their citizenship laws. This often resulted in making citizenship both
more liberal (lowering residence requirements and tolerating dual citizenship) and more restrictive (introducing
integration clauses and citizenship tests). The surge in terrorist activities in the EU, which involve citizens, prompted
several Member States to revise or reactivate citizenship provisions allowing for citizenship to be revoked. Concerns
about immigrants' integration, allegiance and belonging, as well as about the cultural and economic consequences of
regional integration and globalisation are at the heart of recent debates about citizenship in Europe. As the Maltese
case of investor citizenship shows, the issue of access to citizenship is no longer a matter that concerns Member
States alone. The bundling of national and EU citizenship means that Member States have a certain responsibility
towards each other when taking decisions over who to accept (or reject) as citizens.
Briefing EN
A Europe without internal borders? Free movement of persons
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data25-06-2018
AutoreKLUGMAN-VUTZ Cornelia
Settore di interventoMercato interno e Unione doganale | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | cittadinanza europea | cittadino straniero | controllo alla frontiera | dimensione transfrontaliera |
diritto di soggiorno | diritto di stabilimento | famiglia | frontiera interna dell'UE | libertà di circolazione | lotta contro la
criminalità | migrazione illegale | mobilità scolastica | politica dell'UE in materia di visti | sicurezza europea
Riassunto Different groups of EU citizens enjoy the right to freedom of movement across the EU, making it possible to work in
another Member State, retire, study, set up a business, follow a family member or look for a job. EU citizens, tourists
and businesses benefit from these rights as well as the Schengen area, which greatly facilitates freedom of movement.
Contrary to popular belief, thus opening internal EU borders has not led to an increase in crime. Rather, Schengen
innovations such as enhanced police cooperation and harmonised external border controls help Europe work against
cross-border crime. Closing EU internal borders again could lead to costs of between €100 and 230 billion over 10
years.
Briefing EN
12-03-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 8The migration challenge [What Think Tanks are thinking]
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 21-06-2018
Autore CESLUK-GRAJEWSKI Marcin
Settore di intervento Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | Africa | analisi demografica | gruppo di riflessione | integrazione dei migranti | politica migratoria
dell'UE | relazione multilaterale | Sahel | Siria | Turchia
Riassunto Next week, European Union Heads of State or Government will discuss the politically charged issue of reforming the
EU’s migration and asylum policies. Divisions among EU members over how to handle migrants were exposed again
earlier this month when Italy’s new government tightened its migration policy, while the German ruling coalition faced a
potentially destabilising rift over the issue. The EU's southern borders remain under pressure from irregular migrants
escaping poverty and war in the Middle East and Africa. Although the 2016 agreement between the EU and Turkey
significantly slowed the influx of migrants into Europe, the problem continues to be used for political gain by nationalist,
anti-immigrant and populist movements across the EU. This note offers links to commentaries and studies on migration
by major international think tanks. Earlier papers on the same topic can be found in a previous edition of 'What Think
Tanks are Thinking', published in March 2018.
Briefing EN
The fight against terrorism
Tipo di pubblicazione Studio
Data 25-05-2018
Autore BAKOWSKI Piotr | VAN BALLEGOOIJ Wouter
Settore di intervento Democrazia UE | Democrazia UE, diritto istituzionale e parlamentare | Diritti dell''uomo | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e
giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | azione dell'UE | controllo alla frontiera | cooperazione di polizia (UE) | frontiere esterne dell'UE |
lotta contro la criminalità | organismo dell'UE | riciclaggio di denaro | scambio d'informazioni | sicurezza europea | Stato
membro UE | terrorismo | vittima civile
Riassunto Significant benefits could be achieved by the EU and its Member States by addressing the gaps and barriers in the
area of the fight against terrorism, notably by developing an evidence-based EU criminal policy cycle involving the
European Parliament and national parliaments. In this context, EU institutions should conduct comprehensive ex-ante
assessments and ex-post evaluations of counterterrorism measures, in line with better law-making principles. The
effectiveness and fundamental rights compliance of counter-radicalisation programmes should continue to be
monitored. The framework for countering terrorism requires further refinement. A European law enforcement culture
with full respect for fundamental rights needs to be fostered in which relevant information is shared and analysed,
judicial cooperation tools are properly utilised and seeking the support of EU agencies becomes a natural reflex. This
also requires the allocation of significant resources aimed at training and exchanges. Beyond resulting in more
relevant, coherent, effective and efficient action in the fight against terrorism, such measures could increase the
wellbeing of the population, reduce the material and immaterial impacts of terrorism, and ensure protection of
fundamental rights when impacted by counterterrorism measures.
Studio EN
EU asylum, borders and external cooperation on migration: Recent developments
Tipo di pubblicazione Analisi approfondita
Data18-05-2018
AutoreATANASSOV Nikolai | DUMBRAVA Costica | MENTZELOPOULOU Maria-Margarita | RADJENOVIC Anja
Settore di interventoSpazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | aiuto ai rifugiati | apolide | cittadino straniero | controllo alla frontiera | diritto d'asilo | Frontex |
migrazione di ritorno | organismo dell'UE | paesi terzi | politica migratoria dell'UE | profugo | Stato membro UE |
trasferimento di popolazione
Riassunto This publication takes stock of recent EU developments in the area of asylum, borders and external cooperation on
migration. It discusses key initiatives put forward by the EU in order to respond to migratory challenges, focusing on
three major aspects: reforming the common European asylum system, strengthening the EU's external borders and
reinforcing the EU's external cooperation on migration.
Analisi approfondita DE, EN, FR
12-03-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 9European territorial cooperation
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 23-03-2018
Autore VAN LIEROP Christiaan
Settore di intervento Sviluppo regionale
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | controllo delle conoscenze | cooperazione europea | cooperazione regionale | cooperazione
territoriale europea | cooperazione transfrontaliera | Fondo europeo di sviluppo regionale | Fondo strutturale | politica
europea di vicinato | statistiche dell'UE | sviluppo regionale
Riassunto Established in 1990, the first European territorial cooperation initiative, Interreg I, focused on cross-border cooperation.
Action in this area has expanded over the years to cover broader initiatives such as trans-national cooperation,
involving countries from wider geographical areas, and inter-regional cooperation, which brings together regions from
across the whole EU. These three strands together make up European territorial cooperation, which is one of the two
main goals of cohesion policy today. With the removal of Europe's frontier posts, travelling across borders has become
second nature for millions of European citizens. European territorial cooperation has brought Europeans closer
together, strengthened connectivity and improved the natural environment, supported by EU mechanisms such as the
European groupings of territorial cooperation, and macro-regional strategies. Yet despite these achievements,
numerous obstacles to closer cooperation still remain, such as divergent national rules in the areas of employment,
healthcare and social security. Recent years have witnessed increased calls to address these hurdles, with the 2015
Luxembourg EU Presidency putting forward a proposal for a new instrument for cross-border projects, and the
European Commission organising a cross-border review to identify remaining bottlenecks in the area, leading to a
2017 communication on boosting growth and cohesion in EU border regions. The European Parliament has also
adopted a resolution on European territorial cooperation as part of this process. With discussions under way on the
future of cohesion policy, there is general agreement on the importance of strengthening Interreg beyond 2020. Yet
despite the many achievements of this policy over the years, continued EU support for European territorial cooperation
is arguably critical, with the partial reintroduction of border controls in recent years revealing just how fragile territorial
cooperation can be. This is an updated edition of a briefing from September 2016: PE 586.666.
Briefing EN
Policy Departments' Monthly Highlights - March 2018
Tipo di pubblicazione In sintesi
Data 12-03-2018
Settore di intervento Affari esteri | Bilanci | Commercio internazionale | Controllo dei bilanci | Cultura | Democrazia UE, diritto istituzionale e
parlamentare | Diritti dell''uomo | Occupazione | Questioni finanziarie e bancarie | Sanità pubblica | Spazio di libertà,
sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | bilancio dell'UE | dati personali | diritto del lavoro | giovane | investimento estero | libera
circolazione delle persone | numerizzazione | protezione dei dati | protezione dell'infanzia
Riassunto The Monthly Highlights publication provides an overview, at a glance, of the on-going work of the policy departments,
including a selection of the latest and forthcoming publications, and a list of future events.
In sintesi EN
The Future of the Schengen Area: Latest Developments and Challenges in the Schengen Governance
Framework since 2016
Tipo di pubblicazione Studio
Data 06-03-2018
Autore esterno Prof. Sergio Carrera, Dr Marco Stefan, Dr Ngo Chun Luk , Lina Vosyliūtė
Settore di intervento Diritti dell''uomo | Diritto UE: sistema e atti giuridici | Sicurezza e difesa | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia |
Sviluppo e aiuti umanitari | Valutazione del diritto e delle politiche nella pratica
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | controllo alla frontiera | frontiera interna dell'UE | frontiere esterne dell'UE | governance |
migrazione illegale | profugo | raccolta dei dati | Stato membro UE
Riassunto This Study, commissioned by the European Parliament’s Policy Department for Citizens’ Rights and Constitutional
Affairs at the request of the Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs (LIBE-Committee), takes stock of
the main developments that have occurred in the Schengen Governance Framework since 2016. It analyses the
legitimacy of a number of States’ decisions to maintain internal border controls. Also, most recent policy proposals in
the field of internal police checks are assessed in light of relevant EU legal standards. The paper also questions the
legality of the border walls and fences, which have been recently erected at the EU external borders and within the
Schengen area.
Studio ES, DE, EN, FR
12-03-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 10Interoperability between EU information systems for security, border and migration management
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 14-02-2018
Autore EISELE Katharina
Settore di intervento Diritti dell''uomo | Sicurezza e difesa | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia | Valutazione d''impatto ex ante
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | ammissione di stranieri | biometria | controllo alla frontiera | dati personali | frontiere esterne
dell'UE | politica dell'UE in materia di visti | politica migratoria dell'UE | protezione dei dati | scambio d'informazioni |
sistema di informazione | spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Riassunto This note seeks to provide an initial analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of the European Commission's impact
assessment (IA) accompanying the above proposals on (1) borders and visa; and on (2) police and judicial
cooperation, asylum and migration, submitted on 12 December 2017 and referred to Parliament's Committee on Civil
Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs. In 2016, the European Commission stressed the need for interoperability between
EU border and security information systems. Likewise, the Joint Declaration on the EU's legislative priorities for 2018-
2019 identified interoperable EU information systems as a key priority. The initiative aims to make information
exchange and data sharing between the various EU information systems more effective and efficient, fully upholding
fundamental rights, so as to boost the protection of the EU's external borders, improve migration management and
enhance internal security. Interoperability is not a new topic, already in 2004 the European Council called for enhanced
interoperability between the Schengen Information System (SIS) II, the Visa Information System (VIS) and Eurodac
(the EU asylum fingerprint database).
Briefing EN
Procedural rights and detention conditions
Tipo di pubblicazione Studio
Data 07-12-2017
Autore VAN BALLEGOOIJ Wouter
Settore di intervento Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | asilo politico | azione pubblica | Carta dei diritti fondamentali dell'Unione europea | cittadinanza
europea | controllo alla frontiera | Convenzione europea dei diritti dell'uomo | cooperazione di polizia (UE) |
cooperazione giudiziaria | diritto dell'UE | lotta contro la criminalità | mandato di cattura europeo | politica migratoria
dell'UE | principio di reciproco riconoscimento | terrorismo
Riassunto Despite the significant EU action and cooperation that has taken place, the rights and detention conditions of those
suspected of committing a crime and serving a sentence in the Member States continue to fail to live up to international
and EU standards. Judicial cooperation within the EU is not yet fully adapted to this reality, it operates in absence of an
EU mechanism monitoring Member States' compliance with practical fundamental rights and lacks specific guidance
for alleged violations. EU legislation on suspects' rights is limited to setting common minimum standards. Even so,
there are already indications of shortcomings concerning key rights to a fair trial, such as the right to interpretation,
translation, information and legal assistance during questioning by the police. Furthermore, certain areas have not
been comprehensively addressed, such as pre-trial detention, contributing to prison overcrowding in a number of EU
Member States. The outstanding divergent levels of protection also create discrimination between EU citizens.
Criminal justice systems remain inefficient and fail to achieve the aims of convicting and rehabilitating the guilty, while
protecting the innocent. This impacts on the individuals concerned, in terms of a denial of their rights and material and
immaterial damage; on their families; and on Member States' societies more generally. The gaps and barriers identified
also have substantial cost implications. Finally, this study assesses the added value of a number of options for EU
action and cooperation to contribute to closing these gaps and taking further steps to ensure the effective protection of
the rights of suspects and detained persons.
Studio EN
Mapping the Cost of Non-Europe, 2014-19 - Fourth edition
Tipo di pubblicazione Studio
Data 07-12-2017
Autore HILLER WOLFGANG
Settore di intervento Ambiente | Commercio internazionale | Diritto contrattuale, diritto commerciale e diritto societario | Energia | Fiscalità |
Mercato interno e Unione doganale | Occupazione | Politica di ricerca | Problemi economici e monetari | Questioni di
genere, uguaglianza e diversità | Questioni finanziarie e bancarie | Semestre europeo | Sicurezza e difesa | Spazio di
libertà, sicurezza e giustizia | Trasporti | Turismo | Valore aggiunto europeo
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | diritti della donna | diritto delle società | evasione fiscale | gestione delle acque | imposta sulle
società | mercato unico | parità retributiva | politica dei trasporti | politica della ricerca | rappresentanza del personale |
relazioni internazionali | Stato di diritto | Unione economica e monetaria | zona euro
Riassunto This study brings together work in progress on a long-term project to identify and analyse the 'cost of non-Europe' in a
number of policy fields. This concept, first pioneered by the European Parliament in the 1980s, is used here to quantify
the potential efficiency gains in today's European economy through pursuing a series of policy initiatives recently
advocated by Parliament – from a wider and deeper digital single market to more systematic coordination of national
and European defence policies or increased cooperation to fight corporate tax avoidance. The benefits are measured
principally in additional GDP generated or more rational use of public resources. The latest analysis suggests that the
European economy could be boosted by €1.75 trillion per year – or 12 % of EU-28 GDP (2016) – by such measures
over time. The study is intended to make a contribution to the on-going discussion about the European Union's policy
priorities over the current five-year institutional cycle, running from 2014 to 2019.
Studio EN
12-03-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 11Area of freedom, security and justice:Untapped potential
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 27-10-2017
Autore VAN BALLEGOOIJ Wouter
Settore di intervento Diritto internazionale privato e cooperazione giudiziaria in materia civile | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | asilo politico | azione pubblica | corruzione | criminalità organizzata | frontiere esterne dell'UE |
migrazione familiare | politica dell'UE in materia di visti | profugo | razzismo | spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia |
Stato di diritto | terrorismo | xenofobia
Riassunto Since the entry into force of the 1997 Treaty of Amsterdam, the EU offers its citizens an area of freedom, security and
justice (AFSJ). In this area, the free movement of persons should be ensured in conjunction with appropriate measures
with respect to external border controls, asylum and migration, as well as the prevention and combating of crime. Since
then, the Union has adopted its own Charter of Fundamental Rights, and the European Parliament has been fully
engaged in shaping the AFSJ as a co-legislator. Two decades later, however, the Union and its Member States still
face major challenges in delivering this objective. Problems have been identified in upholding democracy, the rule of
law and fundamental rights, ensuring a high level of security (notably in the fight against corruption, organised crime
and terrorism), protecting external borders, guaranteeing the right to asylum and developing a common migration
policy. Surveys show that citizens expect the EU and its Member States to deliver in these areas, notably in the area of
migration and the fight against terrorism and fraud. In October 2016, the Parliament's Civil Liberties, Justice and Home
Affairs (LIBE) Committee requested the European Parliamentary Research Service (EPRS) to produce a 'Cost of Non-
Europe Report' on the AFSJ. This paper contains an overview of the existing gaps and barriers in the main policy
areas covered by the AFSJ, and assesses their economic impacts as well as impacts at individual level on
fundamental rights and freedoms. It also assesses options for action at EU level that could address those gaps and
barriers, together with an estimation of their potential cost and benefits.
Briefing EN
Secondary movements of asylum-seekers in the EU asylum system
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 03-10-2017
Autore RADJENOVIC Anja
Settore di intervento Diritti dell''uomo | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave accordo di Schengen | aiuto ai rifugiati | apolide | cittadino straniero | controllo alla frontiera | diritto d'asilo | paesi terzi |
politica migratoria dell'UE | profugo | Stato membro UE | trasferimento di popolazione
Riassunto Secondary movements occur when refugees or asylum-seekers move from the country in which they first arrived to
seek protection or for permanent resettlement elsewhere. While most asylum-seekers seek protection in countries
close to their countries of origin, some are compelled or choose to move (often in an irregular manner) onwards from
or through countries in which they had, or could have sought, international protection, to other countries where they
may request such protection. Many different factors may influence such movements and the decision to settle in a
particular country. The objective of the current instruments of the Common European Asylum System is to limit
secondary movements of applicants for international protection between EU Member States. However, the mass inflow
of asylum-seekers to Europe in recent years has shown that the system has been unable to discourage such
movements. For this purpose, among others, the European Commission proposed in 2016 a comprehensive
harmonisation of asylum rules and a range of new measures on asylum policy.
Briefing EN
Libera circolazione delle persone
Tipo di pubblicazioneNote tematiche sull'UE
Data
01-06-2017
Autore
MARZOCCHI Ottavio
Settore di intervento
Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiaveaccordo di Schengen | cittadinanza europea | cittadino dell'UE | controllo alla frontiera | migrazione familiare | politica
dell'UE in materia di visti | politica migratoria dell'UE | spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Riassunto La libertà di circolazione e soggiorno delle persone all'interno dell'UE costituisce la pietra angolare della cittadinanza
dell'Unione, introdotta dal trattato di Maastricht nel 1992. La graduale eliminazione delle frontiere interne nel quadro
degli accordi di Schengen è stata seguita dall'adozione della direttiva 2004/38/CE relativa al diritto dei cittadini
dell'Unione e dei loro familiari di circolare e di soggiornare liberamente nell'UE. Nonostante l'importanza di tale diritto,
10 anni dopo la data limite per l'attuazione della direttiva sussistono notevoli ostacoli in termini di attuazione.
Note tematiche sull'UE BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV
12-03-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 12Puoi anche leggere
