Elenco delle pubblicazioni del Think Tank del PE
←
→
Trascrizione del contenuto della pagina
Se il tuo browser non visualizza correttamente la pagina, ti preghiamo di leggere il contenuto della pagina quaggiù
Elenco delle pubblicazioni del Think Tank del PE
https://www.europarl.europa.eu/thinktank
Criteri di ricerca utilizzati per generare l''elenco :
Ordina Mostra per data
Parole chiave "partenariato pubblico-privato"
59 Risultati(i)
Data di creazione : 26-04-2022Discarico per il bilancio 2018 – Agenzie decentrate e imprese comuni dell'UE
Tipo di pubblicazione In sintesi
Data 11-05-2020
Autore LILYANOVA Velina
Settore di intervento Controllo dei bilanci
Parole chiave audit finanziario | bilancio generale (UE) | commissione PE | controllo finanziario | Corte dei conti europea | organismo
dell'UE | partenariato pubblico-privato | raccomandazione (UE) | relazione d'attività | ripartizione del finanziamento
dell'UE | scarico del bilancio
Riassunto Nella tornata di maggio, nel contesto della procedura di discarico per l'esercizio finanziario 2018, il Parlamento
europeo voterà sul discarico di 32 agenzie decentrate e 8 imprese comuni dell'UE per l'esecuzione del bilancio per
l'esercizio 2018. La commissione per il controllo dei bilanci propone di concedere il discarico a tutte le agenzie
decentrate e le imprese comuni ma sottolinea al contempo vari ambiti che devono essere migliorati.
In sintesi ES, DE, EN, FR, IT, PL
Public or Private? The Future of Money
Tipo di pubblicazione Analisi approfondita
Data 15-11-2019
Autore esterno Alexander KRIWOLUZKY, Chi Hyun KIM
Settore di intervento Problemi economici e monetari
Parole chiave banca centrale | emissione monetaria | moneta elettronica | partenariato pubblico-privato | valuta virtuale
Riassunto Stablecoins issued by large tech companies pose a significant challenge for traditional fiat money. In this study, we
highlight the importance of a public-private-cooperation in dealing with this topic, where central banks closely work with
stablecoin issuers in issuing synthetic central bank digital currency (sCBDC). This framework minimizes the risks of
private money and utilises the technological advantages of stablecoin issuers.
This document was provided by Policy Department A at the request of the Committee on Economic and Monetary
Affairs.
Analisi approfondita EN
Contribution to growth: European Public Procurement
Tipo di pubblicazione Studio
Data 15-01-2019
Autore esterno Christopher BOVIS
Settore di intervento Adozione della legislazione da parte del PE e del Consiglio | Diritto UE: sistema e atti giuridici | Mercato interno e
Unione doganale | Pianificazione preventiva | Protezione dei consumatori | Valutazione del diritto e delle politiche nella
pratica
Parole chiave aggiudicazione d'appalto | amministrazione elettronica | appalto elettronico | appalto pubblico verde | competitività |
partenariato pubblico-privato | presentazione dell'offerta d'appalto | servizio pubblico | spesa pubblica | strategia di
crescita dell'UE | sviluppo sostenibile
Riassunto This study evaluates the objectives of legislative actions in the area of public procurement during the 7th and 8th
legislature and assesses the contribution of current initiatives to the achievement of EU objectives. This document
provides for a critical analysis of the legal framework of the public procurement regime and identifies the future
potential of European public procurement..
This document was prepared by Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy, at the request of the Committee
for the Internal Market and Consumer Protection.
Studio EN
Adapting to new digital realities: Main issues and policy responses
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 19-04-2018
Autore BENTZEN Naja | NEGREIRO ACHIAGA Maria Del Mar | REILLON Vincent | SAJN Nikolina | SZCZEPANSKI Marcin
Settore di intervento Democrazia UE | Mercato interno e Unione doganale | Pianificazione preventiva | Politica di ricerca | Problemi
economici e monetari | Protezione dei consumatori
Parole chiave cloud computing | competitività | consultazione pubblica | dati personali | diffusione delle innovazioni | disinformazione |
Internet | Internet delle cose | media sociali | mercato unico digitale | numerizzazione | partenariato pubblico-privato |
protezione dei dati | rete d'informazione
Riassunto Digital technologies have changed the way we live and transformed the world around us at unprecedented speed.
They have affected all important aspects of life, both at work and at home, and have influenced almost everything from
human relations to the economy, to the extent that access to the internet has now become a basic human right
recognised by the United Nations. This profound change presents both opportunities and threats to our society.
Citizens need specific skills and access to be able to meaningfully take part in society and work. European businesses
need an adequate policy framework and infrastructure to capture the enormous value created by the digital economy.
Supporting innovation, removing barriers in the digital single market, and effectively managing and using data are the
necessary tools to assist them and boost economic growth in Europe. The European Union takes an active part in
shaping the digital economy and society, with cross policy initiatives that range from boosting investment, through
reforms of copyright and e privacy, to removal of geo-blocking and development of e-government. This multifaceted
approach is necessary to facilitate adaptation to complex new realities. The European Parliament, as co legislator, is
involved in shaping the policy framework which will help citizens and businesses fully utilise the potential of digital
technologies.
Briefing EN, FR
26-04-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 1Interim evaluation of Horizon 2020
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data21-03-2018
AutoreREILLON Vincent
Settore di interventoBilanci | Politica di ricerca
Parole chiave aiuto di Stato | controllo degli aiuti di Stato | diffusione delle informazioni | metodo di valutazione | partenariato
pubblico-privato | politica di cooperazione | programma quadro di ricerca e sviluppo | trasparenza amministrativa
Riassunto As required by the regulation, the interim evaluation of Horizon 2020 – the European Union (EU) framework
programme (FP) for research and innovation – began in October 2016 with a public consultation to gather feedback
from stakeholders three years in. The Commission performed its own mid-term evaluation and asked experts to
evaluate the programme's specific instruments. In parallel, the European Parliament, the Council of the EU and the
advisory committees conducted their own, separate evaluations of the programme. The Commission adopted its
conclusions on the interim evaluation of Horizon 2020 in January 2018, confirming that the programme was relevant
and presented clear EU added value. Implementation was considered to be efficient and the first results suggested
that the programme was also effective in reaching its objectives. The integration of research and innovation and the
Horizon 2020 pillar structure provided for greater internal coherence compared with previous framework programmes.
All the evaluations highlighted four key issues to be addressed by the next FP. First, the programme budget needs to
match better the funding required to bring the success rate back to acceptable levels. Second, the unbalanced
distribution of FP funding across the EU raises concerns regarding the impact of the use of the excellence criterion and
calls for changes to enable the various EU funds to generate more synergistic effects so as to maintain EU
competitiveness and promote EU cohesion in research and innovation. Third, the evaluations highlight the will to
improve the shared, multi-level governance between the EU, Member States and regions and to promote the co-
design and co-construction of the FP with the public and civil society. Finally, there is widespread agreement that the
EU research and innovation funding landscape has become too complex and should be streamlined, questioning the
EU added value of each of the instruments and partnerships.
Briefing EN
New ways of financing transport infrastructure projects in Europe
Tipo di pubblicazioneStudio
Data
01-03-2018
Autore
KRITIKOS Michail
Autore esterno EPRS, DG;
Settore di intervento
Ambiente | Sviluppo regionale | Trasporti
Parole chiavedimensione transfrontaliera | finanziamento | fondo (UE) | gestione finanziaria | inquinamento automobilistico |
investimento | partenariato pubblico-privato | pedaggio | rete di trasporti | rete transeuropea | strategia di crescita
dell'UE | veicolo elettrico
Riassunto This study assesses a range of mechanisms to finance transport infrastructure projects in cross-border regions, and
analyses the strategic role that European Groupings of Territorial Cohesion (EGTC) could play in the planning and
implementation of cross-border investments. Special attention is given to often neglected small-scale projects, whose
investment is up to €1 million. Building on an in-depth literature review, and supported by interviews with various
regional cooperation structures and an experts’ workshop, the study analyses the current situation regarding the
availability of financing tools for new technologies that enhance transport infrastructure in cross-border regions. It also
outlines sources of financial support that could meet investment needs and assesses technological challenges and
trends in the field of Intelligent Transport Systems, with a focus on regional interoperability. The study ends with
suggestions of policy options to facilitate and accelerate cross border transport infrastructure projects.
Studio EN
Allegato 1 EN
Stronger Bacteria. Weaker Antimicrobial, The fight against antimicrobial resistance in Europe through
research, and the Andalusian PIRASOA program. Two examples of examples of success still to be
completed
Tipo di pubblicazione Analisi approfondita
Data11-01-2018
Autore esterno José Miguel Cisneros
Settore di interventoSanità pubblica | Valutazione del diritto e delle politiche nella pratica
Parole chiave Andalusia | farmacologia | partenariato pubblico-privato | programma di ricerca | resistenza agli antimicrobici | sanità
pubblica | sistema sanitario | sorveglianza dei medicinali | studio di fattispecie
Riassunto The research is the key to the fight against Antimicrobial Resistance, but funding against the AMR in Europe is not
acceptable because of the magnitude of the heath problem. In this context, in Andalusia (Spain), the PIRASOA
Programme has been successfully implemented and developed, integrated into the daily clinical practice. The
preliminary outcomes show a reduction of antimicrobial consumption and antimicrobial resistance and an improvement
of antimicrobial prescription profile and. However, it is necessary to maintain professional motivation and more
technical and human resources.
Analisi approfondita EN
26-04-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 2Research for REGI Committee - Public Private Partnerships and Cohesion Policy
Tipo di pubblicazione Studio
Data 15-11-2017
Autore esterno CSIL: Gianni CARBONARO, Gelsomina CATALANO, Laura DELPONTE, Silvia VIGNETTI
supported by (case studies) Filippo ADDARII and Fiorenza LIPPARINI (PlusValue), Dariusz ZWIERZYNSKI
Settore di intervento Sviluppo regionale | Valutazione del diritto e delle politiche nella pratica
Parole chiave coesione economica e sociale | cooperazione regionale | fondo di coesione | investimento privato | investimento
pubblico | partenariato pubblico-privato | programma dell'UE | ripartizione del finanziamento dell'UE
Riassunto The objective of this study is to describe the role of Public-Private Partnerships (PPPs) in Cohesion Policy. The study
finds that the use of PPPs in Cohesion Policy has been limited and concentrated in a number of Member States and
sectors, in spite of favourable regulatory changes. Evidence shows that PPPs are useful instruments to implement
projects on time and on budget, but the assessment of outcomes over the long-term period is still limited and not
conclusive.
Studio EN
Towards food security in Africa: Are international private-public initiatives paving the way?
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data16-10-2017
AutoreLATEK Marta
Settore di interventoAffari esteri | Sviluppo e aiuti umanitari
Parole chiave Africa | aiuto alimentare | aiuto internazionale | OCSE | paesi terzi | partenariato pubblico-privato | penuria alimentare |
ruolo internazionale dell'UE | sicurezza alimentare
Riassunto The rise in global hunger in recent years undermines the perspective of 'zero hunger by 2030' set out in the United
Nations Agenda 2030. Africa is particularly affected, with more than a quarter of its population living in a situation of
severe food insecurity, and its agriculture suffering from major hindrances to production. Launched in 2012, the New
Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition (NAFSN) is one of the international initiatives that have both raised high
expectations and opened up controversy. Bringing together governments from both the North and the South,
multinational firms and international agencies, it aims to boost investment in African agriculture so as to increase food
security. Improved commercial seeds, use of inorganic fertilisers, infrastructure development and land-administration
reforms are among the key elements of the project, underpinned by the use of public-private partnerships. After its first
years of implementation, NAFSN proponents praise its market-oriented reforms and investments in the African
countries involved. By contrast, its critics say that while paying lip service to smallholders, it serves the interests of
corporate farming with no proven impact on food security. In 2016, the European Parliament voiced its concerns,
pointing at a number of negative repercussions mainly on small-holders, and calling for a deep revamp of the NAFSN
and the European Union (EU) support for agro-ecology based on small-scale farming. This briefing is a follow-up of an
EP Library Briefing from October 2013.
Briefing EN
Towards a European gigabit society: Connectivity targets and 5G
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data09-06-2017
AutoreNEGREIRO ACHIAGA Maria Del Mar
Settore di interventoIndustria | Politica di ricerca
Parole chiave comunicazione mobile | industria delle telecomunicazioni | innovazione | Internet | mercato unico digitale | nuova
tecnologia | partenariato pubblico-privato | programma dell'UE | rete di trasmissione | tecnologia dell'informazione |
tecnologia digitale | telefono mobile
Riassunto In September 2016, the Commission put forward new strategic connectivity objectives for 2025 as part of its digital
single market strategy. These should prepare Europe for the roll-out of the next generation of broadband infrastructure
with gigabit speeds, including both fixed and mobile internet access (5G). Once available, from 2020 onwards, 5G is
expected to enable an array of new innovative services that will transform sectors such as manufacturing, energy,
vehicle manufacturing and health, bringing them into the era of the internet of things. Given its importance for EU
competitiveness, the Commission is speeding up 5G by co-financing research and development. The 5G-PPP public-
private partnership is the largest initiative of its kind in the world, with €700 million in EU funding, to be topped up with
private funding to reach a total budget of €3.5 billion by 2025. There is some concern that not all consumers and
businesses in Europe will benefit from the gigabit society, given the current and future digital divide between urban and
rural areas and across EU countries. For example if gigabit speeds and 5G are available only to areas with high
demand, users are likely to be highly reluctant to pay for it as many new services will need continuity across borders
and geographic areas. Progress in building the European gigabit society is expected once an updated EU telecoms
framework is in place. This will enable high levels of investment in network infrastructure and increased policy
coordination across Member States, for instance increasing spectrum harmonisation for 5G and co-investment of
deployments. Both the proposed European Electronic Communications Code and the 5G action plan are of high
importance for the Council and Parliament, and essential if the EU is to take the lead in the global 5G race.
Briefing EN, FR
26-04-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 3The European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA)
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data19-05-2017
AutoreZYGIEREWICZ Anna
Settore di interventoRecepimento e attuazione del diritto | Sicurezza e difesa | Valutazione del diritto e delle politiche nella pratica
Parole chiave Agenzia dell’Unione europea per la cibersicurezza | competenza istituzionale (UE) | consultazione pubblica | criminalità
informatica | funzionamento istituzionale | Internet | Parlamento europeo | partenariato pubblico-privato | programma
quadro di ricerca e sviluppo | regolamento (UE) | relazione d'attività | sicurezza europea | statistiche dell'UE
Riassunto Information and communication technologies play an increasing role in modern-day life and in the creation of a digital
society. To ensure further growth, significant investments in security are necessary. Cybersecurity is a growing
concern for citizens, influencing their digital activity. It is also a significant cost for the economy. In 2015, the estimated
worldwide economic impact of cyber-attacks reached US$500 billion. The cybersecurity market in Europe was
estimated at €20.1 billion. The European Union Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA) was established
to support the EU and the Member States in enhancing and strengthening their ability to prevent, detect and respond
to network and information security (NIS) problems and incidents. ENISA is part of the broader legal and policy
environment, which includes the EU cybersecurity strategy and the recently adopted directive on security of networks
and information systems across the EU.
Briefing EN
Joint Technology Initiatives
Tipo di pubblicazione In sintesi
Data 17-05-2017
Autore REILLON Vincent
Settore di intervento Mercato interno e Unione doganale | Politica di ricerca
Parole chiave bilancio per la ricerca | finanziamento dell'UE | impresa comune europea | organizzazione della ricerca | partenariato
pubblico-privato | politica di ricerca dell'UE | programma quadro di ricerca e sviluppo
Riassunto Joint technology initiatives (JTIs) were set up as European institutional public-private partnerships to carry out the
strategic research agenda of some established European technology platforms. Five JTIs were established under the
7th framework programme for research. Evaluation of these JTIs led to development of their legal framework to
simplify their rules and procedures. Six JTIs are currently operational, receiving a €6.7 billion contribution from Horizon
2020.
In sintesi EN
European Technology and Innovation Platforms
Tipo di pubblicazione In sintesi
Data 17-05-2017
Autore REILLON Vincent
Settore di intervento Mercato interno e Unione doganale | Politica di ricerca
Parole chiave energia dolce | iniziativa dell'UE | innovazione | nuova tecnologia | partenariato pubblico-privato | politica di ricerca
dell'UE | politica industriale dell'UE | ricerca e sviluppo | ricerca energetica
Riassunto Following the adoption of the European strategic energy plan (SET plan) in 2007, the European Commission proposed
establishing European industrial initiatives (EII) as public-private partnerships to implement research agendas for the
development and deployment of low carbon energy technologies. In 2015, the energy policy review under the energy
union led to the EIIs merging with existing European technology platforms (ETP) to create nine European technology
and innovation platforms (ETIP). They operate similarly to other ETPs, but are bound to SET plan implementation.
In sintesi EN
European Innovation Partnerships
Tipo di pubblicazione In sintesi
Data 17-05-2017
Autore REILLON Vincent
Settore di intervento Industria | Politica di ricerca | Problemi economici e monetari
Parole chiave Commissione europea | iniziativa dell'UE | innovazione | organizzazione della ricerca | partenariato pubblico-privato |
politica della ricerca | politica industriale dell'UE
Riassunto The European innovation partnerships (EIP) were launched in the context of the innovation union flagship initiative in
October 2010. They were set up with the aim to promote the implementation of a new innovation ecosystem in Europe.
The EIPs were meant to act across policies, sectors and borders to tackle societal challenges and enhance Europe's
competitiveness. A 2014 evaluation concluded that this objective would not be reached given the framework used for
their implementation. With no evolution of their governance, the EIPs remain active as coordination instruments for
research and innovation activities at EU level in their respective fields.
In sintesi EN
26-04-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 4European Technology Platforms
Tipo di pubblicazione In sintesi
Data 17-05-2017
Autore REILLON Vincent
Settore di intervento Mercato interno e Unione doganale | Politica di ricerca
Parole chiave organizzazione della ricerca | partenariato pubblico-privato | politica di ricerca dell'UE | programma quadro di ricerca e
sviluppo | ricerca e sviluppo
Riassunto European Technology Platforms (ETP) were the first type of public-private partnership established in the research field
at European level. These industry-led stakeholders' fora define and implement a strategic research agenda (SRA)
aiming at aligning research priorities in a technological area. Without dedicated funding, ETPs remain coordination and
advisory structures, helping to define the topics of research programmes at European, national and regional level.
In sintesi EN
Public-private partnerships in research
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 17-05-2017
Autore REILLON Vincent
Settore di intervento Mercato interno e Unione doganale | Politica di ricerca
Parole chiave azione comune | partenariato pubblico-privato | politica di ricerca dell'UE | ricerca | tecnologia
Riassunto The EU public-private partnerships (PPPs) in research were set up in the context of the development of European
Research Area policy in 2003 with two main objectives. First, they were to address the fragmentation of research
efforts between the private and public sector and across borders. Second, they were to increase public and private
investment in research activities to reach the target of 3 % of EU gross domestic product. The first PPPs – the
European Technology Platforms and the Joint Technology Initiatives – were developed to achieve these objectives.
The initial focus of the PPPs on research activities was broadened in 2005 with the introduction of a more
comprehensive view of innovation. The European Institute of Innovation and Technology and its Knowledge and
Innovation Communities were set up to embody this new vision by promoting the integration of research, innovation
and education activities. The 2008 financial crisis demanded swift action to support investments in research and led to
the establishment of the rapidly implemented contractual PPPs. By 2010, the focus on technology challenges had
been replaced by the need to tackle societal challenges. The European Innovation Partnerships provided a new tool to
better address these challenges by integrating all the actors of the innovation process. Around 70 EU PPPs in
research help define common priorities and visions for EU, national and regional research and innovation activities.
However, the multiplication of PPPs created a new form of fragmentation with different types of PPPs focusing on
similar fields. The 3 % target has not been reached (currently at 2.03 %). The share of private investment in research
has stagnated at around 55 % since 2004, whereas the share of the budget of the EU framework programme for
research (FP) dedicated to the PPPs has more than doubled (9.1 % for FP7 versus 21.5 % for Horizon 2020). All these
aspects will have to be considered when setting the budget for the PPPs in FP9.
Briefing EN
Contractual public-private partnerships in research
Tipo di pubblicazione In sintesi
Data 17-05-2017
Autore REILLON Vincent
Settore di intervento Mercato interno e Unione doganale | Politica di ricerca | Questioni finanziarie e bancarie
Parole chiave organizzazione della ricerca | partenariato pubblico-privato | politica di ricerca dell'UE | programma quadro di ricerca e
sviluppo | ricerca e sviluppo
Riassunto The first three contractual public-private partnerships in research were established as a tool to address the 2008
financial crisis. Their main feature is prior consultation of industry in defining the topics of the calls in the framework
programme for research. This allows better alignment of the topics with industry needs, especially regarding
demonstration projects, increasing the participation of private actors in the programme. The scheme, easier to
establish than institutional public-private partnerships such as the joint technology initiatives, was extended under
Horizon 2020 with a budget of €7.15 billion ring-fenced for 10 of these partnerships (almost 10 % of the programme's
budget).
In sintesi EN
26-04-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 5Cybersecurity in the EU Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP): Challenges and risks for the EU
Tipo di pubblicazione Studio
Data 16-05-2017
Autore esterno EPRS, DG; Panagiotis Trimintzios, Georgios Chatzichristos, Silvia Portesi, Prokopios Drogkaris, Lauri Palkmets,
Dimitra Liveri and Andrea Dufkova.
Settore di intervento Sicurezza e difesa
Parole chiave competenza istituzionale (UE) | cooperazione UE-NATO | criminalità informatica | drone | impresa privata | Internet |
istituzione dell'Unione europea | NATO | organizzazione internazionale | paesi terzi | partenariato pubblico-privato |
politica di sicurezza e di difesa comune | riqualificazione professionale | sicurezza europea | Stato membro UE
Riassunto This report is the result of a study conducted by the European Union Agency for Network and Information Security
(ENISA) for the European Parliament’s Science and Technology Options Assessment (STOA) Panel with the aim of
identifying risks, challenges and opportunities for cyber-defence in the context of the EU Common Security and
Defence Policy (CSDP). Acceptance of cyber as an independent domain calls for the investigation of its integration
with the EU’s current and future policies and capabilities. ENISA analysed the related literature and work on
cybersecurity, including its own publications, to form the basis for this study. In addition, a number of stakeholders,
experts and practitioners, from academia, EU institutions and international organisations, were consulted in order to
ensure the study is well-founded and comprehensive. The study revolves around three thematic areas, namely:
policies, capacity building, and the integration of cyber in the CSDP missions, with the last one being the main focus of
the study. For each thematic area, we compile a set of policy options, covering different levels, starting from the EU’s
political/strategic level and progressing down to the operational and even tactical/technical levels of the CSDP’s
supporting mechanisms. These policy options are summarised in a separate options briefing document accompanying
this study.
Studio EN
Allegato EN
Allegato 2 FR
Allegato 3 DE
Documentation from the Workshop on Oversight and Resources of Partially and Fully Self-Financed
Agencies
Tipo di pubblicazione Studio
Data 15-05-2017
Autore esterno Mr Silvano PRESA, Deputy Director General, DG BUDG DGA2, European Commission
Mr Alberto SPAGNOLLI, Senior Policy Advisor, European Food Safety Authority (EFSA; EFSA chairs the EU Network
of Agencies)
Prof. Ellen VOS, Leading project partner, The Academic Research Network on Agencification of EU Executive
Governance (TARN)
Mr Martin EKVAD, President of the Community Plant Variety Office (CPVO)
Mr Jean-Michel MASTIO, Deputy Director of Resources and support, Head of Finance and procurement department of
the European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)
Settore di intervento Bilanci | Controllo dei bilanci | Democrazia UE, diritto istituzionale e parlamentare
Parole chiave cofinanziamento | esercizio finanziario | finanziamento dell'UE | gestione delle risorse | governance multilivello |
organismo dell'UE | partenariato pubblico-privato | personale | risorse di bilancio
Riassunto The workshop aimed to address topics concerning fully and partially self-financed agencies related to both BUDG and
CONT committees’ competences.
With regards of the agencies' resources, the workshop looked into the principles of fee setting, and 5% cut and the
redeployment pool vs. the need to provide timely services to industry, which is paying for them.
From the point of oversight, items for discussion included the question of discharge procedure for fully self-financed
agencies, provisions for prevention of conflict of interest in case of the fee collecting agencies, ECA financial audit
outsourcing provisions, and the question of carryovers.
Points of interest for both BUDG and CONT remain the questions of performance, efficiency and effectiveness, such
as indicators for measuring outputs and ways to compare them across the agencies, developing synergies and shared
services, and possible grouping or clustering of the agencies.
Studio EN
Cyber Security Strategy for the Energy Sector
Tipo di pubblicazione Studio
Data 05-12-2016
Autore esterno David Healey (Analysys Mason Limited), Sacha Meckler (nalysys Mason Ltd.), Usen Antia (nalysys Mason Ltd.) and
Edward Cottle (nalysys Mason Ltd.)
Settore di intervento Energia | Industria | Pianificazione preventiva | Politica di ricerca
Parole chiave armonizzazione delle norme | attentato contro la sicurezza dello Stato | cooperazione europea | criminalità informatica
| industria energetica | normalizzazione | partenariato pubblico-privato | scambio d'informazioni | sicurezza europea |
tecnologia digitale | Ucraina
Riassunto This study is provided by the Policy Directorate at the request of the ITRE Committee.
The EU energy infrastructure is transitioning into a decentralised, digitalised smart energy system. Already, energy
operations are increasingly becoming the target of cyber-attacks with potentially catastrophic consequences.
Development of energy specific cyber security solutions and defensive practices are therefore essential. Urgent action
is required, including empowering a coordination body, to promote sharing of incident information, development of best
practice and relevant standards.
Studio EN
26-04-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 6European Leadership in 5G
Tipo di pubblicazione Analisi approfondita
Data15-11-2016
Autore esterno Colin BLACKMAN (Camford Associates Ltd ; CEPS) and Simon FORGE (SCF Associates Ltd.)
Settore di interventoIndustria | Pianificazione preventiva | Politica di ricerca
Parole chiave comunicazione mobile | industria delle telecomunicazioni | innovazione | Internet | investimento industriale | mercato
unico digitale | nuova tecnologia | partenariato pubblico-privato | programma dell'UE | rete di trasmissione | strumento
elettronico | tecnologia dell'informazione | tecnologia digitale | telefono mobile
Riassunto Prepared by Policy Department A at the request of the European Parliament’s Committee on Industry, Research and
Energy (ITRE), this report examines the concept for 5G, how it might fit in the future telecommunications landscape,
the state of play in R&D in the EU and globally, the possible business models and the role of standards and spectrum
policy, to assess the EU’s strategic position.
Analisi approfondita EN
The Joint Programming Initiatives
Tipo di pubblicazioneIn sintesi
Data
21-10-2016
Autore
REILLON Vincent
Settore di intervento
Politica di ricerca
Parole chiavegovernance | iniziativa dell'UE | partenariato pubblico-privato | programma di ricerca | programma quadro di ricerca e
sviluppo | Stato membro UE
Riassunto Joint programming is a process by which EU Member States establish a joint research strategy to tackle major societal
challenges. The objective is to reduce research landscape fragmentation, and to align national research programmes
and resources for more impact. Although the Member States launched ten Joint Programming Initiatives (JPIs) to
implement this process, evaluation of the JPIs revealed that they lacked political and financial commitment to joint
programming.
In sintesi EN
Research for TRAN Committee - Status Report on the Deployment of SESAR
Tipo di pubblicazioneStudio
Data
13-05-2016
Autore esterno Washington Yotto Ochieng (FREng) and Milena Studic
Settore di intervento
Trasporti | Valutazione del diritto e delle politiche nella pratica
Parole chiaveaviazione civile | cielo unico europeo | controllo aereo | cooperazione tecnica | EFTA | Eurocontrol | impresa comune |
mercato unico | Organizzazione per l'aviazione civile internazionale | partenariato pubblico-privato | piano di sviluppo |
sicurezza aerea | spazio aereo | valutazione di progetto
Riassunto This report captures the status of deployment of SESAR through the Pilot Common Project (PCP) in terms of state of
play, costs and timeliness. It is concluded that the PCP implementation is on time and underpinned by a credible
management structure. The expenditure to date through the Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) mechanism is EUR
325.4 million, out of EUR 3 billion planned for 2014-2020. However, as the PCP implementation is at an early stage,
the benefits are still to be quantified.
Studio EN
Scrutiny on Horizon 2020 Focusing on the European Parliament’s Priorities
Tipo di pubblicazione Analisi approfondita
Data 15-02-2016
Autore esterno Pinar TEMEL (rdyn Consultants), Pernilla SJÖGREN (akdene Hollins), Edward SIMS (akdene Hollins) and Sandra
MEGE (rdyn Consultants)
Settore di intervento Pianificazione preventiva | Politica di ricerca
Parole chiave coesione economica e sociale | diffusione delle innovazioni | finanziamento dell'UE | Istituto europeo di innovazione e
tecnologia | partenariato pubblico-privato | piccole e medie imprese | politica di ricerca dell'UE | professioni scientifiche
| programma quadro di ricerca e sviluppo | pubblicazione ad accesso aperto | ricerca energetica | risultato della ricerca
| uguaglianza di genere
Riassunto This in-depth analysis provided by Policy Department A at the request of the ITRE committee, focuses on the
European Parliament’s key priorities for the Horizon 2020 programme. It assesses the extent to which the EP’s key
priorities have been implemented in the programme. It identifies measures, programmes and policy actions addressing
these priorities, as well as bottlenecks in the implementation processes. It provides policy recommendations to improve
the implementation of existing measures.
Analisi approfondita EN
26-04-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 7Industry 4.0
Tipo di pubblicazione Studio
Data 15-02-2016
Autore esterno Jan SMIT (Centre for Strategy & Evaluation Services LLP), Stephan KREUTZER (Centre for Strategy & Evaluation
Services LLP), Carolin MOELLER (Centre for Strategy & Evaluation Services LLP) and Malin CARLBERG (Centre for
Strategy & Evaluation Services LLP)
Settore di intervento Industria | Pianificazione preventiva | Politica di ricerca
Parole chiave ammodernamento industriale | armonizzazione delle norme | creazione di posti di lavoro | impatto delle tecnologie
dell'informazione | industria delle comunicazioni | innovazione | Internet | investimento industriale | norma di qualità |
partenariato pubblico-privato | politica industriale dell'UE | proprietà intellettuale | riqualificazione professionale |
sviluppo industriale | tecnologia digitale
Riassunto This study, prepared by Policy Department A at the request of the ITRE committee, analyses the Industry 4.0 Initiative
which encompasses the digitalisation of production processes based on devices autonomously communicating with
each other along the value chain. It considers the potential of the initiative and business paradigm changes and
impacts of this transformation. The study assesses the rationale for public intervention and outlines measures that
could be adopted to increase the gains and limit the threats from Industry 4.0.
Studio EN
Research for REGI Committee - Services of General Interest in the Funding Period 2014-2020
Tipo di pubblicazione Studio
Data 15-01-2016
Autore esterno Erik Gløersen, Marius Drăgulin, Silke Haarich, Sabine Zillmer, Frank Holstein, Cristian Lüer and Sebastian Hans
(Spatial Foresight)
Settore di intervento Pianificazione preventiva | Sviluppo regionale
Parole chiave coesione economica e sociale | conseguenza economica | economia sociale | Fondo strutturale | meccanismo di
finanziamento dell'UE | mercato unico | partenariato pubblico-privato | politica della concorrenza dell'UE | recessione
economica | servizio d’interesse generale | squilibrio regionale | sviluppo regionale
Riassunto The study analyses the role that SGI can play in the 2014-2020 programming period, and how the European Structural
and Investment Funds (ESIF) framework can impact them. It shows that the ESIF contributions to improved SGI
provision can be strengthened through a focus on capacity building efforts and more integrated territorial approaches.
SGI-related cohesion policy measures can, as a complement to European competition policy, help to build a social
market economy in the European Union.
Studio EN
Horizon 2020 budget and implementation: A guide to the structure of the programme
Tipo di pubblicazione Analisi approfondita
Data03-11-2015
AutoreREILLON Vincent
Settore di interventoPolitica di ricerca
Parole chiave agenzia esecutiva | bilancio generale (UE) | Centro comune di ricerca | Commissione europea | esecuzione del
bilancio | funzionamento istituzionale | Istituto europeo di innovazione e tecnologia | partenariato pubblico-privato |
piccole e medie imprese | politica di ricerca dell'UE | programma quadro di ricerca e sviluppo | ricerca in seno
all'impresa | sistema di finanziamento | spesa di ricerca (UE)
Riassunto Horizon 2020, the current framework programme for research and innovation, inherited features from its predecessors,
whilst simultaneously proposing a new architecture to support all activities in the research and innovation system –
from blue-sky research to close-to-market applications. Including all these dimensions introduced several levels of
complexity to the programme's implementation. Following the distribution of the budget – from the nine Commission
Directorates-General which oversee Horizon 2020, to the 22 bodies which manage its implementation, along three
main pillars and two specific objectives – this document provides a guide to the programme exploring the multiple
levels of complexity.
Analisi approfondita DE, EN, FR
26-04-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 8EU-Brazil cooperation on internet governance and ICT issues
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data30-10-2015
AutoreLAZAROU Eleni
Settore di interventoAffari esteri | Governance globale | Sicurezza e difesa | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave Brasile | controspionaggio | cooperazione tecnica | dati personali | flusso transfrontaliero di dati | governance | Internet
| materiale per le telecomunicazioni | partenariato pubblico-privato | protezione dei dati | regolamentazione delle
telecomunicazioni | rete di trasmissione | Stati Uniti
Riassunto Following revelations of large-scale Internet surveillance Brazil and the EU have become actively involved in the global
debate on internet governance. Since early 2014 cyber policy has become part of the agenda of the EU-Brazil
Strategic Partnership. The two have agreed on the need for support for inclusive and transparent internet governance
based on a multistakeholder governance model, and are moving forward on a number of related bilateral initiatives in
the 2015-2017 Joint Action Plan. In 2014, Brazil hosted the Global Multistakeholder Meeting on Future Internet
Governance (NETMundial) which established principles on internet governance endorsed by both the EU and Brazil.
These encompass inclusiveness, legitimacy, accountability, and global public interest. As a move towards greater
independence of digital flows between Latin America and the Europe, the Brazilian government and the EU are
developing a project to establish a public-private partnership to lay a submarine fibre-optic cable across the Atlantic
Ocean, from Fortaleza (Ceará, Brazil) to Lisbon (Portugal). Please click here for the full publication in PDF format
Briefing EN
Industry 4.0: Digitalisation for productivity and growth
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data22-09-2015
AutoreDAVIES Ron
Settore di interventoIndustria
Parole chiave ammodernamento industriale | armonizzazione delle norme | creazione di posti di lavoro | impatto delle tecnologie
dell'informazione | industria delle comunicazioni | innovazione | investimento industriale | norma di qualità | partenariato
pubblico-privato | politica industriale dell'UE | proprietà intellettuale | riqualificazione professionale | sviluppo industriale
Riassunto Many observers believe that Europe is at the beginning of a new industrial revolution, considered to be the fourth such
leap forward and hence labelled Industry 4.0. The ubiquitous use of sensors, the expansion of wireless communication
and networks, the deployment of increasingly intelligent robots and machines – as well as increased computing power
at lower cost and the development of 'big data' analytics – has the potential to transform the way goods are
manufactured in Europe. This new, digital industrial revolution holds the promise of increased flexibility in
manufacturing, mass customisation, increased speed, better quality and improved productivity. However to capture
these benefits, enterprises will need to invest in equipment, information and communication technologies (ICTs) and
data analysis as well as the integration of data flows throughout the global value chain. The EU supports industrial
change through its industrial policy and through research and infrastructure funding. Member States are also
sponsoring national initiatives such as Industrie 4.0 in Germany, the Factory of the Future in France and Italy, and
Catapult centres in the UK. However challenges remain. The need for investment, changing business models, data
issues, legal questions of liability and intellectual property, standards, and skills mismatches are among the challenges
that must be met if benefits are to be gained from new manufacturing and industrial technologies. If these obstacles
can be overcome, Industry 4.0 may help to reverse the past decline in industrialisation and increase total value added
from manufacturing to a targeted 20% of all value added by 2020. Please click here for the full publication in PDF
format
Briefing EN
Connecting Europe Facility
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data01-09-2015
AutorePAPE Marketa | PARRY Matthew | WILSON Alex Benjamin
Settore di interventoBilanci | Energia | Trasporti
Parole chiave innovazione | mobilità sostenibile | partenariato pubblico-privato | progetto di interesse comune | rete di trasmissione |
rete di trasporti | rete energetica | rete transeuropea | sistema di trasporto intelligente | strategia di crescita dell'UE |
strumento finanziario dell'UE | sviluppo sostenibile | telematica
Riassunto The European Commission estimates that some €970 billion should be invested in trans-European transport,
telecommunications and energy network infrastructure by 2020 if Europe is to reach its full potential in terms of growth
and cohesion. The Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) is designed to contribute to this objective, through a mix of
grants, procurement, financial instruments and project support.
Briefing EN
26-04-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 9Digitisation of Europe's film heritage
Tipo di pubblicazioneBriefing
Data
09-07-2015
Autore
PASIKOWSKA-SCHNASS Magdalena
Settore di intervento
Cultura
Parole chiavearchivio | armonizzazione delle norme | base di dati | cinema | diritto d'autore | fondo (UE) | numerizzazione |
partenariato pubblico-privato | patrimonio culturale | produzione cinematografica | programma dell'UE | protezione del
patrimonio | Stato membro UE | tecnologia digitale | trasformazione tecnologica
Riassunto EU film heritage covers over 120 years of cinema history and its technological evolution. The recent digital shift has
resulted in significant digitisation of film production and distribution chains. Consequently, films produced on other
formats (for example, 35mm film or magnetic recording) can only be accessed if appropriate screening equipment is
preserved and operational, or the material is digitised.
This challenge has redefined the scope of the work and tasks performed by European film heritage institutions. These,
mostly publicly funded, bodies have a mission to preserve European films and make them accessible.
The process of film heritage digitisation comprises many stages, involving both technical and legal elements. The legal
issues include copyright clearance, which enables authors, producers and other rights-holders to receive payment for
use or exploitation of their work. Rights management systems vary considerably between EU Member States, as do
the technical solutions applied for digitising, preserving and making such digital content accessible. These technical
and legal disparities lead to difficulties and higher costs in cross-border or interinstitutional access to film heritage.
As these issues are common to all Member States, solutions at EU level could allow mass digitisation of European film
heritage, and improve the process, thus reducing costs. Since 2000, the European Commission and the European
Parliament, together with the Council, have supported moves to foster cooperation in this field. European funding is
available to co-finance such efforts.
Briefing EN
'Shift to Rail' – Research for EU rail transport
Tipo di pubblicazione In sintesi
Data 26-03-2015
Autore SCORDAMAGLIA Damiano
Settore di intervento Politica di ricerca | Trasporti
Parole chiave finanziamento dell'UE | impresa comune europea | industria ferroviaria | innovazione | partenariato pubblico-privato |
politica comune dei trasporti | programma quadro di ricerca e sviluppo | rete transeuropea | struttura istituzionale |
trasporto ferroviario
Riassunto The EU is faced with major societal issues such as rising transport demand, traffic and road congestion, security of
energy supply and cutting CO2 emissions. Greater reliance on rail transport and improvements to the sector's
competitiveness and resource-efficiency could help tackle these problems. To this end, a new EU initiative for a public-
private partnership, the 'Shift to Rail Joint Undertaking' (S2R JU), was established in 2014 under the Horizon 2020
programme, in order to boost and coordinate research and innovation in rail products, processes and services.
In sintesi EN
Addressing conflicts of interest in public-private partnerships (PPPs)
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data16-01-2015
AutoreSGUEO Gianluca
Settore di interventoBilanci | Controllo dei bilanci | Diritto UE: sistema e atti giuridici | Mercato interno e Unione doganale
Parole chiave commercio estero | conflitto di interessi | contratto pubblico | globalizzazione | partenariato pubblico-privato | politica di
sviluppo | proprietà intellettuale | regolamento finanziario | sviluppo economico
Riassunto The term 'public-private partnership' (PPP) is used to describe a broad and varied spectrum of cooperative
relationships between public actors (governments, agencies and international organisations, or a combination thereof)
and private actors (companies or not-for-profit entities). There is therefore no standard global definition of precisely
what a PPP is. PPPs have increased in number over the past decade. This has given rise to concerns regarding the
exposure of PPPs to the risk of conflicts of interest. Such risks may arise, for example, with the possibility that
preference is given to national tenderers or applicants whenever a contract is awarded by the public contracting
authorities; or through the possibility that weaker actors may be excluded from participating in a PPP because of the
preference given a priori to stronger actors. The EU attempts to strike a balance by combining broad definitions of
conflicts of interest with a number of legal tools tailored to identifying, managing and resolving specific conflicts. The
legal tools currently in place to avoid conflicts of interest in this context can be divided into two broad categories. Hard-
law tools include provisions for ensuring that public officials perform their duties in a fair and unbiased way. These
rules apply along the entire decision-making process concerning PPPs. To complement such rules, a vast array of
soft-law tools is also in place, including criteria to guide decisions of public actors on support to enterprises or financial
intermediaries, support for internationally recognised guidelines and principles, and commitment towards voluntary
initiatives to increased fiscal transparency.
Briefing EN
26-04-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 10Comparative Analysis of Risk Management Tools Supported by the 2014 US Farm Bill and the CAP
2014-2020
Tipo di pubblicazioneStudio
Data
15-12-2014
Autore esterno Jean Cordier (UMR SMART-LERECO, Agrocampus Ouest INRA)
Settore di intervento
Agricoltura e sviluppo rurale | Pianificazione preventiva
Parole chiavecalamità agricola | fluttuazione dei prezzi | mercato agricolo | Organizzazione mondiale del commercio | partenariato
pubblico-privato | prezzo agricolo | prezzo dei prodotti agricoli | reddito dell'azienda agricola | riserva di bilancio (UE) |
sostegno agricolo | Stati Uniti | studio comparativo
Riassunto The 2014 Farm Bill includes risk management tools as an integral component of national agricultural policy whereas
the CAP 2014-2020 seems to include them as an afterthought. While EU principles are sound, policies remain in limbo.
They suffer from a double dichotomy: two CAP pillars and two administrative levels for implementation.
Ten recommendations are proposed for transforming the current state of limbo for EU agricultural risk management
policy into a coherent CAP linked to world markets. They cover (1) EU coordination between public safety nets and
private risk management tools, (2) flexible funding with improved reserve funds and precautionary savings, and (3)
field tests to take full advantage of the creativity of private-public partnerships and to create an experience curve.
Studio DE, EN, FR
Crowdfunding – an alternative financing option for SMEs
Tipo di pubblicazione In sintesi
Data 25-11-2014
Autore WIDUTO Agnieszka
Settore di intervento Industria
Parole chiave comunità virtuale | creazione di imprese | finanziamento dell'impresa | giovane impresa | impatto delle tecnologie
dell'informazione | partecipazione | partenariato pubblico-privato | piccole e medie imprese | ravvicinamento delle
legislazioni
Riassunto The economic and financial crisis has significantly reduced banks' lending to businesses. This gap in financing,
coupled with the rise of social media and interactive online platforms, has contributed to the increased popularity of
crowdfunding as a possible alternative source of funding. In this context, the European Commission adopted a
communication on unleashing the potential of crowdfunding in the EU, as part of efforts to improve the long-term
financing of enterprises and encourage innovation.
In sintesi EN
Review of Security Measures in the 7th Research Framework Programme FP7 2007-2013
Tipo di pubblicazione Studio
Data 11-04-2014
Autore esterno Didier BIGO (CCLS – King’s College London, United-Kingdom), Julien JEANDESBOZ (CCLS – University of
Amsterdam, Netherlands), Médéric MARTIN-MAZE (CCLS) and Francesco RAGAZZI (CCLS – University of Leiden,
Netherlands)
Settore di intervento Sicurezza e difesa | Spazio di libertà, sicurezza e giustizia
Parole chiave applicazione dell'informatica | controspionaggio | impatto delle tecnologie dell'informazione | partenariato pubblico-
privato | politica di ricerca dell'UE | politica industriale dell'UE | programma quadro di ricerca e sviluppo | protezione
civile | protezione della vita privata | scienze sociali | sicurezza europea
Riassunto Upon request by the LIBE Committee, this study analyses how the public-private dialogue has been framed and
shaped and examines the priorities set up in calls and projects that have received funding from the European
Commission under the security theme of the 7th Research Framework Programme (FP7 20072013). In particular, this
study addresses two main questions: to what extent is security research placed at the service of citizens? To what
extent does it contribute to the development of a single area of fundamental rights and freedoms? The study finds that
security research has only partly addressed the concerns of EU citizens and that security research has been mainly
put at the service of industry rather than society.
Studio EN
26-04-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 11Financing for Development Post-2015: Improving the Contribution of Private Finance
Tipo di pubblicazione Studio
Data 09-04-2014
Autore esterno Jesse GRIFFITHS (Eurodad, Belgium), Matthew MARTIN 'Development Finance International, the UK), Javier
PEREIRA (A&J Communication Development Consultants, Belgium) and Tim STRAWSON (Development Initiatives,
the UK)
Settore di intervento Questioni finanziarie e bancarie | Sviluppo e aiuti umanitari
Parole chiave aiuto agli investimenti | aiuto allo sviluppo | finanze pubbliche | finanziamento dell'aiuto | garanzia degli investimenti |
investimento estero | investimento privato | movimento di capitali | paese in via di sviluppo | paese meno sviluppato |
partenariato pubblico-privato | sistema di finanziamento
Riassunto This overview of financing for developing countries finds that government spending is the largest domestic resource,
domestic private investment is also growing, outflows of private financial resources are very large, real net financial
private flows are overstated, and ODA is the largest flow to least developed countries. Global public finance cannot be
directly substituted by private finance, as it pays for public goods, is more predictable and counter-cyclical, and can be
targeted at the poorest countries. Global private finance mainly goes to higher income countries and has difficultly
targeting MSMEs or paying for public services. Leveraging private finance has faced many problems including in
proving additionality, intransparency and lack of ownership, and poor evidence of development impact. Instead, we
should focus on how international public flows can reduce barriers to private sector investment through investing in
essential services, and how the EU can alter policies including by reforming investment treaties, curbing illicit financial
flows, supporting fair debt workout mechanisms and developing responsible financing standards.
Studio EN
Opportunity for food security in Africa? The New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition (NAFSN)
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 07-10-2013
Autore LATEK Marta
Settore di intervento Sviluppo e aiuti umanitari
Parole chiave Africa | agricoltura sostenibile | cooperazione agricola | etica imprenditoriale | FAO | indipendenza alimentare | industria
dei fertilizzanti | partenariato pubblico-privato | penuria alimentare | politica delle strutture agricole | programma
alimentare mondiale | proprietà fondiaria agricola | riforma agraria
Riassunto The G8's recent New Alliance for Food Security and Nutrition (NAFSN) initiative is attracting more and more African
states. Bringing together governments from both the North and the South, multi-national firms and international
agencies, it aims to boost investment in African agriculture so as to increase food security. After its first year of
implementation, NAFSN proponents praise its market-oriented reforms and investments in the six founding African
countries. In contrast, both African and global NGOs remain sceptical, pointing to a number of negative repercussions
mainly on small-holders.
Briefing EN
Innovative financial instruments for EU policies
Tipo di pubblicazione Briefing
Data 29-08-2013
Autore D'ALFONSO Alessandro
Settore di intervento Bilanci | Questioni finanziarie e bancarie | Sviluppo regionale
Parole chiave bilancio generale (UE) | euroemissione | infrastruttura economica | investimento | partenariato pubblico-privato |
regolamento finanziario | strumento finanziario dell'UE | valutazione di progetto | verifica ispettiva
Riassunto Unlike pure grants, innovative financial instruments (IFIs) are EU budget tools that trigger equity or debt funding, for
example in the form of investments in share capital, loans or guarantees. Financial institutions and intermediaries are
often involved in their implementation on behalf of the European Commission (EC). IFIs are not deemed to fit all kinds
of public spending, but have features that make them attractive. Notably, they are expected to increase the impact of
the EU budget by leveraging additional funding from other sources. In addition, IFIs generate income through amounts
repaid by beneficiaries of funding that can be used for new operations in line with the same policy objectives.
Briefing EN
Proceedings of the Workshop on "Ubiquitous Digital Single Market"
Tipo di pubblicazione Studio
Data 14-06-2013
Autore esterno Giovanni Sartor (European University Institute of Florence), Yong Woo Lee (University of Seoul), Koji Ouchi (Mission
of Japan to the European Union), Catherine Dickson (Mission of Canada to the European Union), Silver Tammik
(Permanent Representation of Estonia to the EU), Nicola Westmore (G-Cloud), Henri Rauch (Kwaliteits Instituut
Nederlandse Gemeenten), Mark Lange (Microsoft), Sameer Verma (SAP), Jakob Kucharczyk (CCIA Europa) and
Jörgen Gren (DG CONNECT, European Commission)
Settore di intervento Mercato interno e Unione doganale | Politica di ricerca
Parole chiave amministrazione elettronica | Canada | Corea del Sud | Estonia | Giappone | memorizzazione dei dati | Paesi Bassi |
partenariato pubblico-privato | Regno Unito
Riassunto The last decade marked a move from electronic, through mobile to ubiquitous services, defined as intelligent services
providing users with real-time access to collaboratively generated information, everywhere, at any time and on any
device. The workshop presents leading examples of ubiquitous government services applied in South Korea, Japan,
Canada, Estonia, the UK and the Netherlands, as well as ubiquitous market services, with the objective of considering
how Europeans could benefit from ubiquitous government and market solutions.
Studio EN
26-04-2022 Fonte : © Unione europea, 2022 - PE 12Puoi anche leggere
